Gnomicon 143

If you have not already done so, you may wish to read the
Introduction to Gnomica.

Gnomicon  143
Saturday 29 September 2012

Read gnomica 1-100 here!

101     102     103     104     105     106     107     108     109     110     111     112     113     114     115     116     117     118     119     120     121     122     123     124     125     126     127     128     129     130     131     132     133     134     135     136     137      138     139     140     141     142

Cambodia wanted no part of SEATO.
We would look after ourselves as neutrals and Buddhists.
Norodom Sihanouk(31 Oct 1922 – )

Cambodia!

Kampuchea!

The very names conjure up in our collective imagination horrifying [WARNING: some links bring up very disturbing photos of human inhumanity] images of the 1975-1979 nightmare that was the real-world implementation of all the ‘high theory’ discussed in Paris around seminar tables at the Sorbonne among the psychopathic Maoists like Pol Pot (19 May 1925 – 15 Apr 1998) and his ilk.

That horror story is well known.

Sihanouk, the on-again-off-again King who loved jazz and was into making films, went from being French puppet to being Khmer Rouge puppet to being king again.  And lest I be misunderstood here, I am not – from the safety of my distant place and the security of my remote time – taking the man to task for doing and not doing what he didn’t and did before, during and after the Vietnam War.  Not even Heaven knows all the kinds of dreadful, impossible situations he was forced into during much of his life, nor do I know enough about him, his country, and that era of Khmer Rouge rule to be making judgments.

But it is the statement above that I wish to consider here.

When SEATO was being formed in the mid-fifties, Sihanouk offered his bold declaration of his country’s ‘independence’ and view of itself as peace-loving Buddhists.  It came eventually at astronomical cost to the people of Cambodia.  It is perhaps reminiscent of that other political folly fatuously trumpeted a short generation earlier by another ‘leader’: “Peace for our time!

Acquiescence to the encroachments of the bully – whether the one in the school yard that we read so much about today, or the one strutting across the contemporary world stage (depending on where you are, pick your own candidate[s]!) – is, historically viewed, not likely to have a good outcome for the one who acquiesces, whether a person or a polity.

The thought actually brings me up short, for while I bemoan and berate that constant beating of the American military drum and our readiness to engage in both quite silly (invasion of Grenada [1983]) and quite serious (a currently nuclearizing Iran) contretemps, I fully appreciate that it is beyond naïve blindly and irresponsibly to ignore the realities of Realpolitik.  The world is not always and everywhere such a nice place, and being ‘nice’ to the bullies out there is in my view not good strategy.  I wish Matthew 5:44 were always solid advice, but it isn’t.

Listen to Teddy Roosevelt:
Speak softly and carry a big stick.

Listen to Henry Kissinger (and others before him):
Nations do not have friends, they only have interests.

This entry was posted in GNOMICA and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s