Gnomicon 248

If you have not already done so, you may wish to read the
Introduction to Gnomica.

Gnomicon  248
Tuesday 14 January 2013
Read gnomica 1-200 here!

201     202     203     204     205     206     207     208     209     210     211     209     210     211     212     213     214     215     216     217     218     219     220     221     222     223     224     225     226     227     229     230     231     232     233     234     235     236     237     238     239     240     241     242     243     244     245     246     247

Never underestimate the power of the State to act out its own massive fantasies.
Don DeLillo (20 Nov 1936 –  )

This best-selling author of often crime-tinted fiction set in the milieu of modernity and the modern world here personifies the state, and not in a very flattering fashion – but not with total inaccuracy, either.  It’s an interesting device, this personification of The State – as old as the ancient Greeks (e.g., Socrates discussion with the State aka The Laws in Crito).

The State, then, like any individual, has its fantasies of various sorts, and unlike any (or most) individuals has the means or the wherewithal to translate fantasy into action.  The State has for all practical purpose pretty much unlimited funds at its disposal, and the funds it does not have on hand it simply borrows in the name of its constituent units (aka citizens) and issues IOUs payable at some not terribly specific point in the future.  And then The State — this supra-organismal entity — can go ahead and do as it wishes.

What kinds of things does it do?

It does all kinds of things, falling into various general categories – among them such activities as ‘securing its funding sources’, ‘protecting itself against violence from beyond its borders’, ’safeguarding itself from internal disruptions’, ’educating its constituencies’, ‘creating a cultural climate in which the arts might flourish’, ‘promoting business and manufacturing’, ‘supporting job creation’, … .  Here the personification analogy does tend to break down, because although individuals secure funding sources in order to carry on, unlike The State they usually do not have the power to act out even minor – never mind massive – fantasies with impunity.  Further, the individual is inescapably held accountable for what issues from the liberation onto the world of whatever fantasies live in her head, but how is The State … who is The State to be held accountable to anybody for anything that it does or is done in its name?

It is in this sense, at this free-floating nexus between The State and its citizens, that I see DeLillo’s comment coming into its own.  Thus, even if one might be able to point to certain specific actors as inextricably involved in implementing any “massive fantasies” of The State, The State itself is as a matter of operational actuality above and beyond any kind of effectual accountability.  It’s not like a business (e.g., Enron), where there are in fact actors whom the superordinate reality of The State can go after and hold accountable and punish – but in the case of a derelict activity by that very State, what superordinate reality above it can spring into anything like effective action, make a finding of accountability and then punish accordingly?  And whom?

(I suppose that was supposed to be the point of some supra-national organization like the United Nations … well, need more be said?)

Yes, The State is in some sense its citizens but The State is just as much not its citizen, is something much more massive, more beyond control than its citizens.  And history validates the folly of an underestimation — whether by internal friend or exterior foe — of its transactional power to ‘do’.

This entry was posted in GNOMICA and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Gnomicon 248

  1. Albert Cram says:

    So long as the STATE follows the constitution we Should be safe from a breakaway sort of STATE fantasy. In most cases where states, such as Germany in the 1930s, or Cambodia or Uganda more recently decide to eliminate some members of their society, which are for reasons of religion, ethnicity, or some other innate failing in the eye of the leadership now a danger to the state, the first step on the path of elimination is to disarm the law abiding public. Of course that would never happen here, would it? The United Nations, which could never survive without your and my tax dollars, will not come to help us should such an event begin here.

  2. laohutiger says:

    Agreed … PROVIDED the state follows the constitution as currently understood. But a “breakaway sort of STATE fantasy” covers a lot of territory … e.g., killing a U.S. citizen, phony WMD justifications, … Is state sanctioned torture on sound legal footing? Of course, in an ideal (as I define the word) world we would have no problems with anything …
    Thanks as always for the input!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s